Sources of error in radiometric dating Chatroulette sex online web chat
It is well known that argon, which is a gas, diffuses easily through rock, and there is no way of knowing whether that may have happened in any given case.Errors are particularly bad with the K-Ar (potassium-argon) method. Joan Engels wrote: It is now well known that K-Ar ages obtained from different minerals in a single rock may be strikingly discordant.3 Skull 1470 In 1972 Richard Leakey found a skull, near Lake Rudolf in Kenya, that he said was "virtually indistinguishable" from that of a modern human." The only answer to that question is that "good" samples give dates that are in accord with evolutionary presuppositions."Bad" samples are the ones that give dates not in conformity with evolutions classic illustration of circular reasoning.5 Grand Canyon Dating Creationists have criticized many aspects of dating rocks by radioactivity, but have offered little real proof that the method is flawed.Certainly the majority of scientists accept radiometric dating.And yet, there is really no scientific reason proving that radiometric dating is correct, and a number of evidences showing that it doesn't work. We'll find that faith in materialism, and rejection of any supernatural activity, is the foundation stone of radiometric analysis, even before any measurements are made.
But we won't discuss the C-14 method in this article.
"How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?
" This article addresses that question, which represents the thinking of a large number of people today.
All of these dating methods begin with some radioactive isotope such as U-238, U-235, Th-232, K-40, or Rb-87. These elements are naturally radioactive, that is, they spontaneously emit an alpha or a beta particle and, as a result, are transformed into some different element, called the "daughter" isotopes.
For those who would like more details, these systems are briefly described in the boxes on the following pages.
Evolutionists often describe these methods as proving the ancient age of the earth and its strata.